A.V.RAVINDRA RABU, PRAKASAM DIST. v. THE CENTRAL ADMN. TRIBUNAL, HYD. & 3 OTHERS
WP/15620/2006 · 2025-09-01
Ninala Jayasurya, Tuhin Kumar Gedela
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33226 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33226 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010496072006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION No.15620 OF 2006 Between: A.V.Ravindra Babu, S/o.Late Sri A.Muralidhar, aged about 23 years, R/o.Market Street, Ravipadu Post, Cumbum Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Petitioner
AND
1. The Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, rep. by its Registrar, and others. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.K.Vasudeva Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: Mr.Battula Raj Kiran
The Dy. Solicitor General of India
The Court made the following ORDER: (per Hon’ble NJS,J)
Though the matter is listed under the caption “For Dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Even on the earlier occasion, there was no representation. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the writ petition.
2. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non–prosecution. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J
_____________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA,J September 02, 2025 vasu