1 2025:CGHC:31397 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 5271 of 2025 Parasram Navrang S/o Late Sadhe Navrang Aged About 33 Years R/o Village- Bhimpuri, Chowki-Junapara, Police Station - Takhatpur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Station House Officer, Outpost - Junapara, Police Station - Takhatpur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Sakib Ahmed, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 08.07.2025 1. This the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicants who have been arrested in connection with Crime No.176/2025 registered at Police Station Outpost Junapara, Police Station Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.), for the offences punishable under Sections 351(2), 115(2), 3(5), 109(1), 190, 191(1)of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 2. As per prosecution story in brief is that on 04.04.2025, a quarrel took VAIBHAV SINGH Digitally signed by VAIBHAV SINGH Date: 2025.07.09 14:22:02 +0530 2 place between the complainant party & accused party and during quarrel, the complainant and his family members namely Shashi Navrang and Jyoti @ Sushma Navrang have received injuries. The incident was reported to the Police Chowki, Junapara, Police Station- Takhatpur, where the aforesaid alleged offences have been registered against the accused Chhedi Navrang, Arjun Navran, Swarath Navrang & others and later on the name of present applicant has been added.. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present applicants are innocent person and have been falsely been implicated in the aforesaid case. He submits that the present applicant has not inflicted any injury upon the complainant or his family member and he went to the incident for purposes of rescue and for pacifying the dispute only and the police has not recovered any article or weapon from the present applicant and he is in jail since 14.05.2025, and conclusion of the trial may take some time, therefore, he prays for grant of regular bail to the present applicant. 4. On the other hand, the learned State counsel opposed the bail application of the present applicant and submitted that the charge sheet has been submitted before the competent Court. He further submits that the present applicant assaulted injured resulting in grievous injuries. Therefore, the present applicant is not entitled to be granted regular bail in this case. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and gravity of the offence, and the fact that both parties sustained injuries 3 during the altercation, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant's father received injuries and subsequently passed away. As per the case diary, the injuries sustained by the injured parties are simple in nature. Moreover, the present applicant has no criminal antecedents, the charge-sheet has been submitted before the competent Court, and the applicant has been in jail since 14.05.2025 and conclusion of the trial may take some more time, this Court is of the considered view that the present applicant is entitled to be released on regular bail in this case. 7. Let the Applicant – Parasram Navrang, involved in Crime No.176/2025 registered at Police Station Outpost Junapara, Police Station Takhatpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.), for the offences punishable under Sections 351(2), 115(2), 3(5), 109(1), 190, 191(1)of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, be released on bail on furnishing personal bond with two local sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that they shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through their counsel. In case of their absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 4 (iii) In case, the applicant misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. Office is directed to provide a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. - Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice vaibhav