Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3322 (CAL)

NEERAJ BANSAL v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

WPO/172/2025 · 2026-07-24

Supratim Bhattacharya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

OD-12 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE WPO/172/2025 IA NO. GA/1/2026 NEERAJ BANSAL VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. BEFORE: THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA Date: 24th July, 2026. Appearance: Mr. Anujit Mookherjee, Adv. Mr. Prithish Chandra, Adv. … for the petitioner. Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, Adv. Mr. Sujit Mitra, Adv. …for Income Tax Department. The Court: Affidavit in opposition on behalf of the respondents is filed today. Let it be kept on record. At this juncture, learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not willing to proceed with the present writ petition and in this regard, a written instruction has been sent to him. A copy of the written instruction is produced before this Court. Let it be kept on record. As the petitioner does not intend to proceed with the present writ petition, the same is dismissed as withdrawn. The connected application also stands dismissed. (SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA, J.) sm