[2025:RJ-JP:7089] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.23084/2018 Rahul Kumar Sharma S/o Sh. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Plot No. 17, Nanu Nagar, Murlipura, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Local Self Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Local Self (Local Bodies) Department, G-3, Rajmahal Palace, Residential Area, Civil Lines Phatak, Bais Godown, Rajasthan, Jaipur 3. Chief Executive Officer, Jaipur Municipal Corporation, Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhayay Bhawan, Lalkothi, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suryapratap Singh Rajawat, Asst. GC for Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 18/02/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been preferred with the following prayer:- “(a) That by appropriate orders, directions, writ or instructions respondents be directed to appoint the petitioner on the post of Safai Karamchari w.e.f. the date his juniors have been appointed with all consequential benefits including pay and allowances without any break or loss. (b) Any other relief which the Hon’ble High Court thinks just and proper in the circumstances of the case in favour of the humble petitioner may also be allowed. (c) Cost of the writ petition be also awarded to humble petitioner.” [2025:RJ-JP:7089] (2 of 2) [CW-23084/2018] 2. By way of filing this writ petition, a direction has been sought against the respondents to appoint the petitioner on the post of Safai Karamchari with effect from the date his juniors have been appointed with all consequential benefits including pay and allowances. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents apprised this Court that the entire selection process for appointment on the post of Safai Karamchari was conducted by the respondents through lottery and there is no person junior or senior to the petitioner to whom appointment was given. The appointment was given as per the draw of results from the lottery. Hence, under these circumstances, the petitioner is not entitled to get any relief. 4. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, this Court finds no merit and substance in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. 5. Stay application as well as all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/160