APHC010496192025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25390/2025 Between: 1. MARLA YEDUKONDALU, S/O MARIA YADAGIRI AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS R/O NAGULAVARAM, MACHERLA PALNADU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DEPUTY GENERAL POLICE, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADU DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GURAZALA SUB DIVISION, PALNADU DISTRICT. 5. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MACHERLA RURAL POLICE STATION, PALNADU DISTRICT. 6. THE ASSISTANT SUB INSPECTOR, NAGARJUNA SAGAR POLICE STATION PALNADU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 2 1. RAMALAKSHMANA REDDY SANEPALLI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25390 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in not properly registering/altering the complaint in Crime No. 71 of 2025, of Nagarjuna Sagar Police Station on 01.09.2025 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents forthwith alter and incorporate the appropriate provision of law by including the offences under 109,118(2) of BNS in Crime No. 71 of 2025 for the offences of Nagarjuna Sagar Police Station on 01.09.2025 in the said crime and to pass such….” 2. Heard Sri Ramalakshmana Reddy Sanepalli, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner sustained grievous injuries but the police have not altered the section of law so far. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent –authorities particularly respondent Nos. 5 and 6 are directed to look into the points raised by the petitioner and take appropriate course of action according to law. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 18.09.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.25390 of 2025 Dated.18.09.2025 UPS 65