Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3321 (RAJ)

KAMLESH D/O MATHURA PRASAD SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/56/2025 · 2025-01-15

Ashutosh Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:1955] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 56/2025 1. Kamlesh D/o Mathura Prasad Sharma, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Kirari Suleman Nagar S-239, Gali No. 8, Prem Nagar-2, North West Delhi, Presently Residing At Gharwari, P.o. Badangarh, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan). 2. Vinod Kumar S/o Jagan Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Gharwari, Po Badangarh, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Superintendent Of Police, Deeg. 4. The Sho, Police Station Sadar Deeg, District Deeg. 5. Prahlad Sharma S/o Mukat Sharma, Residing At Gharwari, Tehsil Deeg, District Deeg (Rajasthan). 6. Balmukand S/o Mukat Sharma, Residing At Gharwari, Tehsil Deeg, District Deeg (Rajasthan). 7. Bharat Sharma @ Holu S/o Prahlad Sharma, Residing At Gharwari, Tehsil Deeg, District Deeg (Rajasthan). 8. Pooran Chand S/o Beedaram, Residing At Gharwari, Tehsil Deeg, District Deeg (Rajasthan). 9. Hariram S/o Pooran Chand, Residing At Gharwari, Tehsil Deeg, District Deeg (Rajasthan). 10. Vijay Sharma @ Pintu S/o Pooran Chand, Residing At Gharwari, Tehsil Deeg, District Deeg (Rajasthan). 11. Pawan Sharma S/o Pooran Chand, Residing At Gharwari, Tehsil Deeg, District Deeg (Rajasthan). 12. Saroj @ Santa S/o Balmukand, Residing At Gharwari, Tehsil Deeg, District Deeg (Rajasthan). 13. Laxman Sharma S/o Prabhudayal Sharma, Residing At Gharwari, Tehsil Deeg, District Deeg (Rajasthan). 14. Dadudayal Sharma S/o Prabhudayal Sharma, Residing At Gharwari, Tehsil Deeg, District Deeg (Rajasthan). 15. Kanhaiya Sharma S/o Prabhudayal Sharma, Residing At Gharwari, Tehsil Deeg, District Deeg (Rajasthan). [2025:RJ-JP:1955] (2 of 3) [CRLW-56/2025] 16. Ramesh Sharma @ Ramme S/o Shyamlal Sharma, Residing At Gharwari, Tehsil Deeg, District Deeg (Rajasthan). 17. Harendra S/o Ramesh Chand, Residing At Gharwari, Tehsil Deeg, District Deeg (Rajasthan). 18. Vishnu Sharma S/o Omprakash, Residing At Gharwari, Tehsil Deeg, District Deeg (Rajasthan). 19. Pinky W/o Vijay Kumar, Residing At Gharwari, Tehsil Deeg, District Deeg (Rajasthan). 20. Archana Sharma W/o Pawan Sharma, Residing At Gharwari, Tehsil Deeg, District Deeg (Rajasthan). 21. Sonu Sharma S/o Raju Sharma, Residing At Gharwari, Tehsil Deeg, District Deeg (Rajasthan). 22. Satish Sharma S/o Shyamlal, Residing At Gharwari, Tehsil Deeg, District Deeg (Rajasthan). 23. Sudha Sharma W/o Satish Sharma, Residing At Gharwari, Tehsil Deeg, District Deeg (Rajasthan). 24. Kamlesh Sharma W/o Ramesh Chand, Residing At Gharwari, Tehsil Deeg, District Deeg (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Narendra Singh Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 15/01/2025 1. Petitioners are present in person and they have been duly identified by their counsel. 2. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.5 to 24 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. [2025:RJ-JP:1955] (3 of 3) [CRLW-56/2025] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1- Kamlesh was earlier married to Sudama, however Sudama died in the year 2014 and after death of her husband-Sudama, the petitioner No.1 has solemnized marriage with petitioner No.2-Vinod Kumar in Arya Samaj Vaidik Vivah Sanskar Trust, Akbarpur Behrampur, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh. Copies of marriage certificate dated 27.11.2024 and marriage registration certificate dated 27.11.2024 have been annexed with the writ petition. Learned counsel further submits that the family members of decesed husband of the petitioner No.1 are not agreable to the marriage of the petitioner. It is also submitted that the petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, therefore, they should be protected. 4. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent no.3- Superintendent of Police, District Deeg and respondent No.3 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 5. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 6. It is made clear that this order shall not prejudice/affect any other legal proceedings initiated between the parties. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J TANISHA /24