KANHAIYA SINGH S/O BHAIRU SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/14432/2024 · 2025-02-19
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33209 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33209 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:7259] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14432/2024 Kanhaiya Singh S/o Bhairu Singh, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Chang Chitar Road, Kherati Ka Naura, Police Station Beawar City, Beawar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer, District Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Kumar Sharma Mr. Harish Meena For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 19/02/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.483/2024 registered at Police Station Beawar City, District Beawar (Rajasthan) for the offence punishable under Sections 19/54 of Rajasthan Excise Act. Later on, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for the same offence.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that alleged offence is triable by the Magistrate. Petitioner is in custody since 30.10.2024 and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by
[2025:RJ-JP:7259] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14432/2024] counsel for the petitioner. She submits that 17 other cases have been registered against the petitioner. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that except one another case, none of the cases have been registered under the Rajasthan Excise Act against the petitioner. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that alleged offence is triable by Magistrate and considering the quantity of allegedly recovered illicit liquor; charge-sheet has been filed in this matter and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion; period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 7. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner -Kanhaiya Singh S/o Bhairu Singh shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station. [2025:RJ-JP:7259] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14432/2024]
9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 10. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner.
In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /81