1 APHC010496552024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4222/2024 Between: 1. KOTHAMADDI PRASAD,, S/O. PITCHAIAH AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, 2. KOTHAMADDI NAGAMUNAIAH,, S/O.PITCHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, 3. DUNNUTHALA CHINNA SUBBA REDDY,, S/O.SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, 4. DUNNUTHALA SUJATHA,, W/O.SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS 5. THUMMALA VENKATA RAMNAIAH,, S/O.VENKATA RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS 6. THUMMALA NARAYANA,, S/O.VENKATA RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, 7. GADEDALA ADILAKSHUMMA,, W/O.SUBBARAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 8. THUMMALA SANKARAMMA, W/O.ADI NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 9. NATTA KRISHNAVENI,, W/O.NATTA KRISHNAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 10. KADE VENKATASUBBAIAH,, S/O.GURAIAH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS. 11. GOPINENI GANGAMMA,, W/O.CHINNA SUBBAIAH, (ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF BHAKARAPETE VILLAGE, SIDAVATAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.) 2 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. G SAI PRASAD, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. S RAMSUNDAR REDDY, THE COMMISSIONER, RANDR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. CHERUKURI SREEDHAR I A S, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. ADITI SINGH, THE JOINT COLLECTOR-CUM-PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. G SREENIVASULU, THE SPECIAL COLLECTOR, GNSS KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. A CHANDRA MOHAN, THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, GNSS UNIT-LL (LAND ACQUISITION) KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 7. PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. J DILEEP KUMAR The Court made the following: 3 ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri S. Lakshmi Narayana Reddy, learned Counsel for the Contempt Petitioners, Sri J. Dilip Kumar, learned Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 6 and Sri Pullagura Nagaraju, learned Counsel for the Respondent No.7. 2. Sri S. Lakshmi Narayana Reddy, learned Counsel for the Contempt Petitioners submits that the Orders of this Court have been complied with and no further consideration is required in this Contempt Case. 3. In compliance with the Order of this Court dated 24.01.2025, all the Respondents (except Respondent No.2) have appeared before the Court. Respondent No.2 has filed Dispense With Petition bearing I.A.No.1 of 2025 and the same is allowed by Order dated 03.02.2025. Since the Orders of this Court have been complied with, the appearance of all the Respondents is dispensed with. 4. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 03.02.2025 Vns