Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33204 (ALL)

VIJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/3820/2025 · 2025-04-27

Vikram D Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:65172 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3820 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vijay Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Srivastava,Ritvik Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The writ petition is filed with the following prayer: "(I)---issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent No.2 to decide the representation letter dated 10-02-2025 (Anenxure No.9) within stipulated period of time." 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that the recommendation for promotion of petitioner is pending consideration. In this respect, petitioner has filed representation dated 10.2.2025 before the respondent no.2, however till date, no order has been passed. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that representation of the petitioner would be decided in a time bound manner. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is hereby provided that the respondent no.2-District Inspector of Schools, Azamgarh shall decide the representation dated 10.2.2025 filed by petitioner in accordance with law, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of a certified copy of the order. 6. It is clarified that this Court has not decided the issue on merits and the authorities concerned shall independently apply its mind and pass order in accordance with law. 7. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 28.4.2025 D. Tamang Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad