RINKU KUMAR S/O KAILASH CHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/14421/2024 · 2025-01-03
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33200 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33200 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:453] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14421/2024 Rinku Kumar S/o Kailash Chand, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Bhaagota Mohalla, Padhana, Sawai Madhopur, District Sawai Madhopur. ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Krishna Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 03/01/2025
1. The instant pre-arrest bail application has been filed under Section 482 B.N.S.S. filed on behalf of the petitioner, who is having apprehension of arrest in FIR No.333/2024 registered at Police Station Mantown, District Sawaimadhopur for the offences under Section 303(2) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 4/21 of MMDR Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has been made accused in this case solely on the basis of the fact that dumper which was seized by the Police is on the name of the petitioner. He further submits that compounding fees as well as penalty has already been deposited by the petitioner. He contends that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required in this matter.
[2025:RJ-JP:453] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14421/2024]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner.
4. I have considered the contentions.
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties and especially the fact that compounding fees as well as penalty has already been deposited by the petitioner, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the pre-arrest bail application.
6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Mantown, District Sawaimadhopur (Raj.) in FIR No.333/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner - Rinku Kumar S/o Kailash Chand, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to their satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii). that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (iv). It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence once in every three months in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded.
[2025:RJ-JP:453] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14421/2024] (v). If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/409