- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3400 CRL.P No. 100442 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI CRIMINAL PETITION NO.100442 OF 2025 [438(CR.PC)/482(BNSS)] BETWEEN: 1. SMT. BHAVANI D/O. JAYATIRTH PADAKI @ BHAVANI, W/O. PAVAN PURANIK, AGE: 23 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. #160, CITY PARK, NAVANAGAR, HUBBALLI, NOW RESIDING AT: 107/C, SNEHA NILAYA, 5TH CROSS, VISHWAPRIYA, BENGALURU. 2. PAVAN S/O. PRANESH PURANIK, AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC. PVT. JOB, R/O. S.B.H COLONY, LINGASGURU, NOW RESIDING AT: 107/C, SNEHA NILAYA 5TH CROSS, VISHWAPRIYA, BENGALURU. 3. BHARAT S/O. JAYATIRTH PADAKI, AGE: 19 YEARS, OCC. CATERING WORK, R/O. #160 CITY PARK, NAVANAGAR, HUBBALLI. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI M.A. PATHAN FOR SRI A.A. PATHAN, ADVOCATE) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA (THROUGH APMC NAVANAGAR POLICE STATION, HUBBALLI) BY H.C.G.P. HIGH COURT BENCH, DHARWAD HIGH COURT BUILDING BENCH, DHARWAD. … RESPONDENT (BY SMT.GIRIJA S. HIREMATH, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 OF CR.P.C. (UNDER SECTION 482 OF BNSS), PRAYING TO GRANT ANTICIPATORY BAIL TO THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.2 TO 4 IN APMC NAVANAGAR POLICE STATION CRIME NO.131/2024 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 506, 34, 504, 406, 420, 465, 468, 471, 417 OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF III ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C. COURT, HUBBALLI. MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Date: 2025.02.20 14:27:39 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3400 CRL.P No. 100442 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI) This petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (‘BNSS’ for short) is seeking for anticipatory bail in Crime no.131/2024 of APMC Navanagar Police Station Hubballi for offences punishable under Sections 506, 34, 504, 406, 420, 465, 468, 471, 417 of Indian Penal Code (‘IPC’ for short) by accused no.2 to 4 (petitioners). 2. Sri MA Pathan, advocate appearing for Sri AA Pathan, learned counsel for petitioners submitted that petitioners – accused no.2 is housewife, accused no.3 was private employee and accused no.4 was doing catering work and permanent residents of Bangalore/Navanagar, Hubballi respectively, having deep roots in society. They were law abiding citizens and though did not commit any offences, they were apprehending arrest for non-bailable offences, in view of registration of Crime no.131/2024 (supra) arraigning them as accused no.2 to 4, based on false allegations and with intent to spoil their reputation. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3400 CRL.P No. 100442 of 2025 3. It was submitted, even in complaint filed by Anita Vaidya (complainant) on 24.12.2024, it was stated that since year 2014, along with her husband, she was into catering business by name “Sri Caterings”. And when Smt.Poornima approached them for work, she was taken as helper. While working, she became close to them and with malafide intention of taking away gold, silver and money lying in house of complainant and her bank account, she gathered information and began creating rift between complainant and her husband. And with intention to cheat them, she acted close to him. She also used to indulge in handsigns, smiling etc in order to gain control over him. On noticing, complainant had warned her. But, Poornima went on to have affair with complainant’s husband. And after confronting them both about their affair and finding that same was mutual, she became sad and leaving behind about 150 grams of gold jewelry valued about Rs.7,00,000/-, 2 Kgs. of silver valued at Rs.1,20,000/- and passbook and cheque book of her Bank Acc. no.89066951028 with KVG Bank, Navanagar Branch, behind in her house, she began residing in separate house in Navanagar along with her children. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3400 CRL.P No. 100442 of 2025 4. Such being case, at 11:00 a.m. on 12.05.2024, when her elder son was standing near Karnataka Circle along with his friends, her husband told him that Poornima had cheated him and bringing him to stage of begging for survival. Though ignored same for few days, thereafter, she asked him to be brought home. On enquiry, he told her that from year 2014 when Poornima joined their business, she had sole intention of cheating them and embezzling their gold, silver and money. With such ill intention, she had created rift between husband and wife, showed affection towards him to gain his confidence which led to complainant residing in separate house. Thereafter, Poornima began coming to his house, and some times get her children also and earned his absolute trust, for fulfilling her dubious plan. Gradually, she got him to give her and her children Rs.10,00,000/- earned from catering business apart from household articles worth Rs.10,00,000/- which he had kept in her house fearing that complainant would take them away. Thereafter with intention to cheat them, she also forged signature of complainant on cheques of her bank account and from 29.08.2022 to 22.09.2022 withdrew Rs.5,94,000/- and when her daughter’s marriage was fixed, she took away 150 gms of gold jewelry without his knowledge - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3400 CRL.P No. 100442 of 2025 melted them into new jewelry and gave them away as dowry. She was alleged to have misappropriated 2 kgs. of silver jewelry etc. also in similar manner. Thereafter, when he confronted her brother – Raju Desai, he had falsely promised to settle everything immediately after wedding of Poornima’s daughter. 5. When complainant approached Poornima along with her husband to enquire about gold jewelry and money, all accused joined together and abused complainant and also threatened to take her life away in case, she came to them again. At that time, complainant had filed application before ACP (North), Hubballi, who had summoned Poornima. But, Poornima impressed upon complainant that they were belonging to same community and should sort out their issues between themselves. Even thereafter complainant had persisted in her demand for return of gold, silver, money as well as household articles. Due to same, there was some delay in filing complaint. 6. It was submitted, there were no specific overt-acts against each of petitioners as would implicate them for offences alleged. It was submitted, entire grievance of complainant was - 6 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3400 CRL.P No. 100442 of 2025 against Poornima (accused no.1) against whom, a highly belated and vague complaint was filed. It was submitted, petitioners were arraigned only to spoil their reputation. It was further submitted accused nos.5 to 7 enlarged on bail in Cr.P.no.100357/2025 disposed of on 07.02.2025. Therefore, sought for granting bail on any conditions. 7. On other hand, Smt.Girija S. Hiremath, learned HCGP however, opposed petition. It was submitted, offences alleged against accused were serious in nature. Especially, offences under Sections 420 and 468 of IPC were punishable with imprisonment for upto 7 years. And specific allegations were made against petitioners. Moreover, investigation was not yet completed. And if petitioners were granted bail, there was likelihood of fleeing or hampering investigation. On said ground sought rejection of bail petition. 8. Heard learned counsel. 9. From above, point that arises for consideration is: “Whether petitioners are entitled for anticipatory bail with conditions?” - 7 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3400 CRL.P No. 100442 of 2025 10. From above, it is seen petitioners substantiated their apprehension of arrest for non-bailable offences, in view of their arraignment in Crime no.131/2024 (supra). 11. Though, nature of offences alleged would appear to be serious, only allegations insofar as petitioners are that with intention to cheat complainant had utilized 150 gms of Gold, melted it and converted into different ornaments and gave it to petitioner no.2 (accused no.3) as dowry and failure to return Gold, when complainant demanded return. 12. Admittedly, entire focus of complaint is against accused no.1. Prosecution has not secured any material as would directly implicate petitioners. Moreover, none of offences are punishable with death or imprisonment for life. However, it would neither be appropriate nor possible to come to any definite conclusion about petitioners committed offences as alleged and same would be matter for trial. Taking note of fact that prosecution has not alleged criminal antecedents against petitioners and not disputed their assertion that they are housewife, Private employee and businessmen respectively and permanent residents of Bengaluru/Navanagar, Hubballi and except bare apprehensions, no material is produced to - 8 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3400 CRL.P No. 100442 of 2025 substantiate contention about petitioners fleeing justice or tampering with investigation, Point for consideration is answered in affirmative, subject to imposing appropriate conditions. Hence, following: ORDER Petition is allowed. Petitioners / accused no.2 to 4 shall be enlarged on bail, in case of their arrest in Crime no.131/2024 of APMC Navanagar Police Station Hubballi for offences punishable under Sections 506, 34, 504, 406, 420, 465, 468, 471, 417 of IPC, subject to following conditions: a) Each of petitioners shall individually appear before Investigating Officer within 15 days from date of this order and execute personal bonds for sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties for likesum. b) They shall appear before Investigating Officer as and when required and co-operate with investigation. c) Until filing of Charge-Sheet, they shall mark their attendance with Investigating Officer between 9:00 am to 4:00 p.m. on every alternative Saturday. - 9 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:3400 CRL.P No. 100442 of 2025 d) They shall not threaten, tamper with or influence prosecution witnesses, either directly or indirectly. e) They shall not indulge in any criminal activities. f) It is clarified that views expressed are prima facie and shall not influence final outcome after trial. SD/- (RAVI V.HOSMANI) JUDGE EM CT:PA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 18