- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:276 CRL.P No. 1592 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1592 OF 2020 BETWEEN: SMT. VEENA K R., DIRECTOR, M/S SUN PLUS SYSTEMS SOLUTION PVT. LTD. W/O PADMANABHA P.N., AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O NO.36 PARVATHI 15TH MAIN ROAD, NANJUNDESHWARA LAYOUT J P NAGAR 5TH PHASE, BENGALURU-560078. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARISH KUMAR M S., ADVOCATE) AND: M/S OPAL COMPUTER NETWORK INDIA PVT LTD NO.109/7 1ST FLOOR 20TH MAIN 5TH BLOCK WEST OF CHORD ROAD, BENGALURU-560010 REP BY ITS DIRECTOR SMT.SUSHMA KALLIANPUR RAMESH R/A NO.3-32, MOODUKUDRU, TONSE EAST, UDUPI, KALLIAUPRI, KARNATAKA-576114. …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 16.08.2018 PASSED IN C.C.NO.22945/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE 42ND A.C.M.M., COURT AT BENGALURU TAKING COGNIZANCE AGAINST THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF THE N.I ACT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA Digitally signed by SWAPNA V Location: high court of karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:276 CRL.P No. 1592 of 2020 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation even when the matter is passed over twice and again called in the afternoon session. The order sheet dated 29.10.2024 reads as under: "Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. Petition is of the year 2020. It is listed for the fourth time for compliance of office objections. I do not find any reason to grant time. It appears the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. However, as a final opportunity, two weeks time is granted for compliance of office objections." Inspite of that, there is no progress in the matter. The petition is of the year 2020. The office objections are not complied with even though the matter is listed for 5th time. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE SPV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13