APHC010494462025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25229 OF 2025 r jr ■' if (S' " -O' u /N * iv 0/ Between: Vellanki Satya Swaroop, S/o. venkata krishnaya aged Puspaleela Nagar, Tangaellamudi, Eluru, Eluru District, Andhra Pradesh 63 years R/0 ...Petitioner AND 1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep By The Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. Pradesh. 2. The Director General of Police, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Superintendent police, Eluru, Eluru Distric. 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Eluru, Eluru District, Pradesh. 5. The Circle Inspector of Police, Eluru II Town Police Station Eluru District Andhrapradesh. 6. Station House Officer, Eluru II Town Police Station District, Andhra Pradesh. 7. Station House Officer, Denduluru Police Station District, Andhra Pradesh. 8. Velianki Bala Baskar Rao, S/o. leela prasad Harsha palace. Flat No. A5 Ashok Nagar, Andhra Pradesh. Andhra Andhra Pradesh. Andhra , Eluru Eluru, Eluru Denduluru Eluru Aged 55years,R/o. Eluru, Eluru District, S/o. Venkateswara Rao, Aged about 75 9. Dr Velianki Vidya Swaroop years, Chanukyapuri Colony, Eluru, Eluru District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Respondents 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the 1 Petition under Article circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be particularly one in the nature of pleased to issue writ, order or direction more Writ of Mandamus declaring the high Respondents in Interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the Respondent is illegal, arbitrary against the principles of Natural Justice, Constitution of India and handed action of the Official Violative of Article 14, 21 and 300A of the consequently direct the official respondents not to interfere in the civil disputes . lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to official respondents not to interfere in the civil disputes between the Respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition direct the th petitioner and the 8 pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S APPADHARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 7: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents No.8 to 9: None appeared The Court made the following: 1 $ ■■ APHC010494462025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 050 THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25229 OF 2025 Between: 1. VELLANKI SATYA SWAROOP, S/0 venkata krishnaya aged 63 years R/0 Puspaleela Nagar, Tangaellamudi, Eluru, Eluru District, Andhra Pradesh ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep By The Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. Andhra Pradesh. 2. The Director General of Police, Mangalagiri, Guntur District Pradesh. Andhra 3. The Superintendent police, Eluru, Eluru Distric. Andhra Pradesh. 4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Eluru, Eluru District, Andhra Pradesh. 5. The Circle Inspector of Police, Eluru II Town Police Station, Eluru, Eluru District Andhrapradesh. 6. Station House Officer, Eluru II Town Police Station, Eluru, Eluru District. Andhra Pradesh. Eluru District. 7. Station House Officer, Denduluru Police Station, Denduluru Andhra Pradesh. 2 8. Velianki Bala Baskar Rao, S/0 leela prasad Aged 55years,R/0 Harsha palace, Flat No. A5 Ashok Nagar, Eluru , Eluru District, Andhra Pradesh. 9. Dr Velianki Vidya Swaroop, S/o. Venkateswara Rao, Aged about 75 years, Chanukyapuri Colony, Eluru, Eluru District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the high handed action of the Official Respondents in Interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the 8th Respondent is illegal, arbitrary against the principles of Natural Justice, Violative of Article 14, 21 and SOOA of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the official respondents not to interfere in the civil disputes and to pass such lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the official respondents not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the 8th Respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: S APPADHARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25229 OF 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for; “...may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the high handed action of the Official Respondents in Interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the 8th Respondent is illegal, arbitrary against the principles of Natural Justice, Violative of Article 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the official respondents not to interfere in the civil disputes and to pass such...” Heard Sri S.Appadhara Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 02. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent police have been interfering in purely civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. It is alleged that the petitioner is being frequently called to the police station and pressurized to settle the matter, though the dispute is civil in nature. 03. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submits that in compliance with the orders passed by this Court in CrI.P. No.2255 of 2025, no further proceedings have been undertaken in Crime No.32 of 2025 on the file of Denduluru Police Station. It is further submitted that the respondent police are not interfering in the subject matter of dispute and are not calling the petitioner to the police station. 04. the learned Assistant Government Pleader not interfering in the civil being taken against the petitioner, this Court In the present case, since categorically submitted that the police are dispute and no coercive action is is of the view that no further orders are required. 05. has Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondent police shall not interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the shall not summon or call the petitioner to with the said civil disputes. In the event any Crime No.32 of 2025 of Denduluru Police of law and the directions 06. unofficial respondents. The police the police station in connection further proceedings are taken in Station, the police shall strictly follow the due process issued by this Court in CrI.P. No,2255 of 2025. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- SRI T SRINIVASA RAO ISTRAR assistant R //true copy// SECTION OFFICER Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, i Guntur District, Andhra To, 1. The Principal Secretary Amaravathi. Andhra Pradesh. General of Police. Mangalagiri 2. The Director Pradesh. 3. The 4. The District Andhra Pradesh. District, Andhra Superintendent Police, Eluru, Eluru Deputy superintendent of Police, Eluru, Eluru Pradesh. 5. The Eluru II Town Police Station, Eluru Circle Inspector of Police, Eluru District, Andhra pradesh. 6. The Station House Officer, Eluru II Town Police Station District. Andhra Pradesh. 7. The Station House Officer, Denduluru Police Station, Denduluru District. Andhra Pradesh. 8. OneCCto SRI. S APPADHARA REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 9. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 10.Two CD Copies Eluru, Eluru j Eluru i I vna . ‘'» 4- 1 ^ I HIGH COURT DATED:18/09/2025 ORDER WP NO. 25229 OF 2025 i ?5SFP2n25 5 ^ Current Section DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS