1 APHC010496432024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 25806/2024 Between: 1. POLA INDIRA, W/O. P. SREERAM REDDY, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O. REDDYCHERUVUPALLI VILLAGE, GORANTIA MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, I.B. DIVISION, PENUKONDA. 4. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, I.B. DIVISION, PENUKONDA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities in not releasing an amount of Rs. 8,79,631/- to the petitioner for the execution of works, Vide Agreement No. 784/2017-18, dated 29.03.2018 and Vide Agreement No. 785/2017-18, dated 29.03.2018, respectively as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to Law and against the Principles of 2 Natural Justice and against the Norms of the Public Policy and to issue consequential direction directing the respondent authorities to release the amounts payable to the petitioner with an interest at 18 percent per annum and to pass such other order or orders in the interest of Justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent authorities to release an amount of Rs. 8,79,631/- to the petitioner for the execution of works. Vide Agreement No. 784/2017-18, dated 29.03.2018 & Vide Agreement No. 785/2017-18, dated 29.03.2018, respectively, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SARANU PHANI TEJA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 25806/2024 ORDER: Sri S.Phani Teja, learned counsel for the petitioner, has informed this Court that the cause in the present petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in the Writ Petition, shall also stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date : 09.09.2025 JLV 4 540 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 25806/2024 Dt.09.09.2025 JLV