[2025:RJ-JP:3666] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14483/2024 Hitesh Bhadu S/o Paburam, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Devaniyon Ki Dhani, Shivkar, P.s. Barmer Gramin, District Barmer, Present Teacher IIIrd Grade, Level-First, Govt. Secondary School, Hemsingh Ki Dhani, Chouvta, Barmer, Rajasthan. (Accused In Present Confined Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Nidhi Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 24/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.41/2024 registered at Special Police Station (SOG), District ATS & SOG for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC and Section 66D of I.T. Act. 2. It is contended by learned senior counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and same are based on documents which are in possession of investigation agency. It is submitted that petitioner is in custody since 25.09.2024. Charge-sheet has been filed and [2025:RJ-JP:3666] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-14483/2024] trial will take time in its conclusion. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. He submits that petitioner has forged sports certificate and in investigation, it has been found that the certificate was not issued by authority concerned. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also considering the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; petitioner is in custody since 25.09.2024; charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Hitesh Bhadu S/o Paburam, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in similar offence(s) during currency of bail granted by this Court. [2025:RJ-JP:3666] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-14483/2024] The petitioner is further directed to mark his presence in the concerned police station once in three months, till trial is concluded. If breach of any of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to petitioner by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /95