- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:58 RFA No. 1962 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1962 OF 2022 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. RUDRAMMA.V W/O NANJUNDA SWAMY.D.P., AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT NO.26, 7TH MAIN, 3RD CROSS, SRINIVASANAGAR, BSK 1ST STAGE, BANGALORE SOUTH, BANGALORE-560 050. 2. BHAGYASHREE.V W/O RUDRAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NO.997, 9TH MAIN, 2ND CROSS, SRINIVASANAGAR, BSK 1ST STAGE, BANGALORE SOUTH, BANASHANKARI, BANGALORE-560 050. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. N.SURESHA., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. S.VEERABHADRACHAR S/O LATE SAVANADACHAR, AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS, R/AT NO.78/1, OLD POST OFFICE ROAD, THYAGARAJANAGAR, 2ND BLOCK, BANGALORE-560 028. 2. PANKAJA.C W/O V.RAVICHANDRA KUMAR, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:58 RFA No. 1962 of 2022 AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT NO.81, 2ND CROSS, 4TH MAIN, BSK 1ST STAGE, SRINIVASANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 050. 3. V.CHANDRA S/O S.VEERABHADRACHAR, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT NO 1249, 6/1, 2ND CROSS, NEAR BMS COLLEGE, BSK 1ST STAGE, BANGALORE SOUTH, BANASHANKARI, BANGALORE-560 050. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the appellants are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed before Registrar (P & H) and also before the Court on several dates and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Despite granting time, office objections are not complied with as of today. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:58 RFA No. 1962 of 2022 The appeal is listed today for orders regarding non- compliance of office objections for the sixth time. A perusal of the entire order sheet reveals that despite giving sufficient opportunities, the office objections are not complied with. Furthermore, the appeal is filed in the year 2022. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The appeal is pending for almost three years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the appellants are not represented. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 53