[2025:RJ-JP:32192] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18144/2022 Pintu Singh S/o Shri Lallu Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Dungarpur Tehsil Lalsot District Dausa (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus Board Of Secondary Education Rajasthan, Ajmer Through Its Secretary ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms.Sudesh Kasana For Respondent(s) : Mr.Parth Vashistha for Mr.Shantanu Sharma JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 18/08/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been preferred with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, most humbly prayed that Your Lordships’ may graciously be pleased to admit and allow this writ petition; call for and examine entire record of the case and a) By an appropriate writ, order and direction in the nature thereof the respondent may kindly be directed to change name of the father Lallu Singh and name of the Mother Urmila Devi and Petitioner name Pintu Singh in the Mark Sheet of Secondary Examination 2015 and Senior Secondary Examination 2017 of the petitioner. b) Any other order or direction this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper be also passed in favour of the petitioner.” [2025:RJ-JP:32192] (2 of 3) [CW-18144/2022] 2. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction for correction of the name of his parents in the marksheet/ certificate of Class-X and Class-XII. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner passed Class-X in the year 2015 and Class-XII in the year 2017 and the correct name of his father is Lallu Singh, correct name of his mother is Urmila Devi as well as his correct name is Pintu Singh. Counsel submits that an oral prayer was made by the petitioner before the respondent-Authorities for doing the needful, but no heed was paid, hence, under these circumstances, the petitioner has approached this Court, by way of filing this writ petition with the aforesaid prayer. 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent-Board opposes the arguments raised by counsel for the petitioner and submits that the office order dated 26.02.2021, the needful exercise is required to be done within the prescribed time. Counsel submits that an application in writing is required to be submitted through the Board and a complete mechanism has been provided for disposal of such kind of applications as and when filed, but in the instant case, no such application in the required format has ever been submitted by the petitioner, hence, under these circumstance, interference of this Court is not warranted. 5. This Court is not going into the controversy involved in this writ petition whether the required correction can be done at this stage or not, but looking to the fact that before approaching this Court, the petitioner has not submitted any application with the relevant documents before the respondents, the instant writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file [2025:RJ-JP:32192] (3 of 3) [CW-18144/2022] the desired documents as per the office order dated 26.02.2021 in case, such application/ document is submitted by the petitioner before the respondents within a period of four weeks from today. It is expected from the respondents to decide the said application submitted by the petitioner strictly in accordance with law expeditiously as early as possible, within a period of six weeks thereafter. 6. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /67