Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33182 (RAJ)

M/S MUSKAN MINES AND MINERALS v. UNION OF INDIA

CW/19250/2019 · 2025-08-27

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19250/2019 M/s Muskan Mines And Minerals, Bhilwara Through Bhanwar Singh R/o S-216, Indraprasth Towers, Mukherjee Uddhan, Bhilwara, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India, Ministry Of Mines, Shastri Bhawan New Delhi Through Its Secretary. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Department Of Mines And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Director, Directorate Of Mines And Geology, Rajasthan Udaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dilip Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rahul Lodha, AGC Mr. Ashush Kumar with Mr. Digvijay Singh JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 27/08/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition following prayer has been made: “a) By an appropriate writ, order and direction in the nature thereof the respondents may kindly be directed to include major mineral Garnet (Abrasive) in the Mining Lease of minor mineral of the petitioner with all consequences thereof. b) Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper be also passed in favour of the Petitioner.” (2 of 2) [CW-19250/2019] 2. A prayer has been made in this petition for issuing directions to the respondents to include the major mineral garnet (abrasive) in the mining lease of minor mineral of the petitioner. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents apprised this Court that an application in this regard was submitted by the petitioner in the office of the respondents and the said application has been rejected on 10.08.2025, hence, under the changed circumstances, no cause of action survives with the petitioner to continue with this petition and this petition has become infructuous. 4. Considering the above, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed. 5. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to assail the order dated 10.08.2025 before appropriate forum of law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/123