- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1783 WP No. 7112 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 7112 OF 2020 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. VIJAY KUMAR s/o SRI.RAMU VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT FLAT NO.001, A-BLOCK, MARUTHI ANUTHAM APARTMENT, 3RD FLOOR, GREEN VILLE LAYOUT, JUNNASANDRA VILLAGE, SARJAPUR ROAD, VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGALORE-560 035. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KUMARASWAMY., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SRI.NANJUNDESHA.N.K. S/O LATE NAGARAJU, R/AT NO.604/3, MARASANDRI VILLAGE, MADHURE HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BANGALORE-561 203. 2. ANDHRA BANK DOMMASANDRA BRANCH, BANGALORE-562 125. REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1783 WP No. 7112 of 2020 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the writ papers, the petition is filed in the year 2020. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The petition is pending from five years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 1