Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33175 (KAR)

MS JAYSHREE GURURAJ v. CISCO SYSTEMS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED

WP/27669/2024 · 2025-02-01

S G Pandit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:4697 WP No. 27669 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT WRIT PETITION NO. 27669 OF 2024 (S-RES) BETWEEN: MS. JAYSHREE GURURAJ D/O MR. HSG RAO, AGED 55 YEARS, R/AT 341 ADARSH PALM RETREAT, BELLANDUR OUTER RING ROAD, BANGALORE - 560103. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GURURAJ, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI MOHAMMED ASHHAR C. K., ADV.) AND: CISCO SYSTEMS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED (A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956) LOCATED AT CISCO SYSTEMS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED SEZ UNIT, CESSNA BUSINESS PARK, KADUBEESANAHALLI VILLAGE VARTHUR HOBLI, SARJAPUR MARATHALLI OUTER RING ROAD, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA-560103 INDIA THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, CISCO SYSTEMS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. PRASANTH V. G., ADV.) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTION DECLARING THE TERM 12(C) (II) OF THE CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL FOR BEING IN CONFLICT WITH ARTICLES 14,21,39(A) AND 41 OF THE CONSTITUTION R/W SECTION 5(1)(D) OF THE SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONES ACT, 2005 AND CONSEQUENTLY Digitally signed by MARIGANGAIAH PREMAKUMARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4697 WP No. 27669 of 2024 SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF TERMINATION DATED 24-04-2015 BY RESTORING THE PETITIONERS STATUS AS A PERMANENT EMPLOYEE HOLDING THE POST OF SENIOR DIRECTOR IN CISCO SYSTEMS (INDAI), PVT. LTD. WITH ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT ORAL ORDER Learned senior counsel Sri.Gururaj, appearing along with learned counsel Sri.Mohammad Ashhar C.K. for petitioner, after arguing the matter for some time seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to file fresh writ petition. 2. Submission of the learned senior counsel is taken on record. 3. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file appropriate petition, in accordance with law. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE MPK CT:bms List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6