SUDESH KUMAR KHOSLA v. HIMANSHU AGGARWAL, DC, GURDASPUR, AND ORS.
COCP/962/2023 · 2025-09-17
Nidhi Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33172 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33172 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
211
Sudesh Kumar Khosla
Dr. Himanshu Aggarwal and others
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: -
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
1.
dated 21.12.2018 (Annexure P ‘Managing Committee R.D. Khosla D.A.V., Model Senior Secondary School and others Senior Secondary School and others
2.
the present petition may be disposed of as the bearing No. 22.05.2025 passed by a co
3.
4.
the parties, the present petition is
5.
6.
17.09.2025 rishu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP Date of Decision: 1 Sudesh Kumar Khosla
Versus
Dr. Himanshu Aggarwal and others
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Mr. Sandeep Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Sunil Chadha, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Tara Dutt, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order 21.12.2018 (Annexure P-1) passed in CR Managing Committee R.D. Khosla D.A.V., Model Senior Secondary School and others vs. Managing Committee R.D. Khosla D.A.V., Model Senior Secondary School and others’.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the the present petition may be disposed of as the No. CR-14313-2018, was disposed of vide judgment dated 22.05.2025 passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
Heard.
In view of the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for , the present petition is disposed of
Rule stands discharged.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .09.2025
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether Reportable
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-962-2023 Date of Decision: 17.09.2025
.… Petitioner
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Sandeep Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Sunil Chadha, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tara Dutt, Advocate for respondents No. 2 and 3.
The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order 1) passed in CR-14313-2018, titled as Managing Committee R.D. Khosla D.A.V., Model Senior Secondary g Committee R.D. Khosla D.A.V., Model At the very outset, learned counsel for the parties submit that the present petition may be disposed of as the aforesaid main petition
disposed of vide judgment dated ordinate Bench of this Court. In view of the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for
disposed of. application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Yes/No
The present petition has been filed alleging violation of order itled as Managing Committee R.D. Khosla D.A.V., Model Senior Secondary g Committee R.D. Khosla D.A.V., Model submit that main petition
disposed of vide judgment dated In view of the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.18 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.