Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33171 (ALL)

RAMHIT AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

WRIC/48869/2006 · 2025-07-23

Kshitij Shailendra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 48869 of 2006 Petitioner :- Ramhit And Others Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sheoram Singh,Janardan Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anuj Kumar,Ranjeet Yadav,Sankatha Rai,Satyawan Yadav Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J. 1. Case called out. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners is not present. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. He submits that on account of death of some petitioners, an abatement application has been filed. 4. Instead of dismissing the writ petition as abated in respect of one or the other petitioners, since nobody is present on behalf of the writ petitioners, it is liable to be dismissed for want of prosecution for all the petitioners. 5. Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution. 6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 24.7.2025 RA Digitally signed by :- RAZIQ ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad