DADI VENKATA SATYANARAYANA GANGARAJU v. The State of Andhra Paradesh,
WP/860/2025 · 2025-01-09
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3317 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3317 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
H IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 860 OF 2025 Between: Dadi Venkata Satyanarayana Gangaraju, S/o. Lakshman Rao Aged about 45 years, Occ: Business, R/o Amberupuram Village, Chodavaram Mandal Vishakapatnam District. ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by.its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District.
2. The Commissioner of Police, Vishakapatnam, Vishakapatnam District.
3. The Superintendent of Police, Paderu Sitarama Raju District.
4. The Superintendent of Police, Anakapalle, Anakapalle District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring inaction of the respondents No.2 to 4 in considering my representation dated 27.12.2024, seeking permission for conducting and exhibiting skill games such as Ring Throw, Ball Box, Dart Throw, Video Games, and Steel Articles Games during the
Sankaranti festive season at Jataras to eke out his livelihood, as illegal, arbitrary, biased and contrary to the well-established legal principles apart from being violative of the fundamental and Constitutional rights guaranteed to me under Articles 14, 19 (1) (g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.2 to 4, to forthwith grant permission to exhibit and conduct the aforementioned skill games.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 to 4, to forthwith grant permission to exhibit and conduct the aforementioned skill games. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. ARUN KUMAR R Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order:
Tf APHC010015312025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 860/2025 Between: Dadi Venkata Satyanarayana Gangaraju ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Paradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
l.ARUN KUMAR R Counsel for the Respondent(S):
l.GP FOR HOME ...RESPONDENT(S) The Court made the following:
ORDER: This Writ Petition has been filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus the inaction of the respondents 2 to 4 in considering his representation dated 27.12.2024 seeking permission for conducting and exhibiting skill games such as Ring Throw, Ball Box, Dart Throw, Video Games and Steel Articles Games during the Sankranthi Festive season at Jataras to eke out his livelihood, as illegal, arbitrary. biased and contrary to the well established legal principles apart from being violative of the fundamental and constitutional rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19(l)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents 2 to 4 to grant permission to exhibit and conduct the skill games.
2
2. Heard Sri R.Arun Kumar, learned counsel for the learned Assistant Government Pleader respondents. Perused the material on record. Petitioner and for Home appearing for
3.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner Petitioner is a small scale business would submit that the man and he has been regularly conducting and exhibiting skill games at different places of the State on the festive season and eking out his livelihood, further submit that the Petitioner submitted
Learned counsel would a representation to respondents 2 to 4 seeking permission to conduct and exhibit Stalls for a period of 45 days at Araku, Paderu villages of Sitarama District and Atchutapuram Village of Chodavaram the said Raju Mandal, Anakapalle District during the Sankranthi festival which is forthcoming and the said representation is pending consideration. Since no orders are passed on the earlier representation. Petitioner made another 27.12.2024 and the same is also pending for consideration. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor has placed on record the written instructions issued by respondent No.2. The relevant reads as under: representation dated paragraphs It is further respectfully submitted that the petitioner, Sri Dadi Venkata Satyanarayana Gangaraju, is at liberty to file a representation before the concerned Station House Officer in the jurisdiction where he intends to conduct the skill events. However, he merely sent a representation to the Unit Officer of Anakapalli District, seeking permission to conduct skill events without mentioning reference of prior
3 permission for hording an event at specific location from concerned Revenue Authorities. It is further respectfully submitted that necessary instructions have already been issued to all Station House Officers of this Unit to that the orders of the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Arnaravathi as per Writ Petition No. 11081 of 2011 are followed. It is further respectfully submitted that the orders and directions previously issued by the Hon'ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Arnaravathi in Writ Petition No. 11081 of 2011, filed by the petitioner Sri Dadi Venkata Satyanarayana Gangaraju, and Writ Petition No. 1250 of 2019, filed by Sri Palla Venkatesh, will be strictly adhered to and followed scrupulously. ensure
5. Considering the submissions and in the light of the above written instructions, the Petitioner is directed to pursue the matter before the Station House Officer, Atchuthapuram Police Station/appropriate authority and the Station House Officer shall consider the Petitioner's representation and take appropriate decision according to the governing rules and law. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall_stand closed. Sd/- P.U.V.BHASK.AR RAO i ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ' //TRUE COPY// SECTTON OFFICER To,
1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Vishakapatnam, Vishakapatnam District
3. The Superintendent of Police, Paderu Sitarama Raju District. 4. The Superintendent of Police, Anakapalle, Anakapalle District. 5.
One CC to Sri. Arun Kumar R Advocate [OPUC]
6. Two CCs to GP For Home, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
7. Three CD Copies GSC
¥ v;^ HIGH COURT DATED:09/01/2025 \
ORDER WP.No.860 of 2025 I 0 JAN ?0?5 g Current Section ^ 73: o DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS