APHC010495842004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 21395/2004 Between: 1. A.PRAKASH REDDY, KADAPA DISTRICT, S/O LATE A.L.NARASIMHA REDDY, OFFICER, SIDDAVATAM BRANCH, RAYALASEEMA GRAMEENA BANK, KADAPA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE CHAIRMAN, ANDHRA PRAGATHI GRAMEENA BANK, HEAD OFFICE, KADAPA 2. THE ANDHRA PRAGATHI GRAMEENA BANK, HEAD OFFICE, KADAPA, REP. BY ITS BOARD OF DIRECTORS CAUSE TITLE OF THE RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2 AMENDED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 17.10.2024 VIDE I.A.NO.1 OF 2024 IN WP NO.21395 OF 2004. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction, preferably in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing the impugned orders dated 5-9-2003 imposing the punishment of reduction in Basic pay by Four stages which shall have cumulative effect on the petitioner even though alleged charges are vague, not specific and not at all proved and further action of the 2nd respondent in dismissing the appeal filed by the petitioner by confirming the orders of the 1st respondent through impugned proceedings Ref.No.112/A/0134/STF/2004, dated 23-1-2004 in a routine manner without 2 application of mind, as illegal, arbitrary violative of article 14,16,19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently set aside the above stated impugned orders with a direction to the respondents to restore all the service benefits to the petitioner IA NO: 1 OF 2004(WPMP 28037 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the impugned orders of the 1st respondent dated 5-9-2003 as confirmed by the 2nd respondent vide proceedings Ref.No.112/A/0134/STF/2004, dated 23-1-2004 IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 101960 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to amend the cause title of the respondents 1 & 2 1. The Chairman, Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank, Head Office, Kadapa, 2. The Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank, Head Office, Kadapa, rep. by its Board of Directors instead of 1. The Chairman, Rayalaseema Grameena Bank, Head Office, Kadapa, 2. The Rayalaseema Grameena bank. Head Office, Kadapa, in W.P.No.21395 of 2004 as well as in I.A also and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K RATHANGA PANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V UMA DEVI 2. K SRINIVASA MURTHY 3 The Court made the following order: Sri M.Johnson Kumar, learned counsel, representing Sri K.Rathanga Pani Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ____ Date: 22.09.2025. MP 4 155 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION No.21395 of 2010 Date: 22.09.2025 MP