Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33165 (CHH)

SMT. ANITA DHURVE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/7312/2025 · 2025-07-24

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:36312 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7312 of 2025 1 - Smt. Anita Dhurve W/o Shri Devan Singh Dhurve Aged About 53 Years Currently Working At Tribal Girls Ashram / Hostel Chilfi Block Bodha District - Kabirdham (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Director Secretary, Department of Schedule Tribe and Schedule Caste Development Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Commissioner Tribe and Schedule Caste Development Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Assistant Commissioner Tribal Development Kabirdham District - Kabirdham (C.G.) 4 - Collector Tribal Development Kabirdham District - Kabirdham (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Kabirdham District - Kabirdham (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Abdul Moin Khan, Advocate. For State-Respondents : Mr. Vinay pandey, Deputy Advocate General. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 25-07-2025 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition claiming the following relief(s):- “10.1 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioner from the respondent authorities for its kind perusal. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authority to consider and decide the representation (Annexure P3) of the petitioner after giving proper opportunity of hearing to her. 10.3 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities not to consider the workplace of petitioner i.e., Tribal Girls School, Chilfi, district Kabirdham to be vacant. 10.4 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authority to allow the petitioner to work as hostel superintendent at Tribal Girls Ashrram / hostel, Chilfi, block Bodla, district Kabirdham where she is presently posted, in the interest of justice. 10.5 That, any other relief or reliefs may also be granted to the petitioner which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner restricted his submission to the extent that the petitioner is presently working as In-charge Hostel Superintendent, Tribal Girls Hostel, Chilfi and now the promotion on the post of Hostel Superintendent Grade C from the post of Hostel Superintendent Grade D is under process and for the consideration of the petitioner she made a representation on 17-06-2025 before respondent No.2, but the same has not been considered till date and respondent No.2 may be directed to consider her pending representation within a stipulated time frame in accordance with law. 3. On the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection that if such a direction is 3 made to decide the pending representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within the stipulated time frame. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material annexed with the petition. 5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, respondent No.2 is directed to decide the pending representation of the petitioner dated 17-06-2025 (Annexure-P/3) within four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order in accordance with law on its own merits. 6. The petitioner is directed to produce a copy of this order before respondent No.2 within a week from today. 7. The writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation and directions. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil