MOHIT GURJAR S/O HARI SINGH GURJAR v. UNION OF INDIA
CW/17507/2024 · 2025-01-23
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33163 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33163 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:3340] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17507/2024 Mohit Gurjar S/o Hari Singh Gurjar, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Vpo Peepalki Tehsil Sikrai District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Union Of India, Department Of Higher Education, Ministry Of Education, Government Of India, Through Its Secretary, 109-C, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi-110001.
2. National Testing Agency, Through Senior Director (Exam), C-20 1A/8, Sector 62 Iitk Outreach Centre, Noida-201309
3. National Medical Council, Through Its Secretary, Pocket- 14, Sector-8, Dwarka Phase-I, New Delhi.
4. Rajasthan University Of Veterinary And Animal Science, Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.P. Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sankalp Vijay for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG Mr. Angad Mirdha Mr. Vishwas Saini for Mr. M.S. Raghav HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 23/01/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that though the petitioner has filed a representation (Annexure-9) dated 15.10.2024, yet the petitioner may be given a liberty to file a fresh and detailed representation within a period of 7 days from the date of passing of this order before respondent No. 4 and the same be decided within a period four weeks thereafter.
[2025:RJ-JP:3340] (2 of 2) [CW-17507/2024]
Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the same. This Court directs respondent No. 4 to consider the representation of the petitioner, if filed, and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously as per the ratio encapsulated in Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. 1665/2024; Neutral Citation: 2024:RJ- JP:5792) and Circular dated 19.02.2024. In light of the aforestated, the present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J ANIL SHARMA /387