Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33156 (CHH)

SURESH KUMAR JAGATRAMKA v. CHHATTISGARH STATE

WPC/4211/2021 · 2025-07-21

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- 2025:CGHC:34850 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4211 of 2021 Suresh Kumar Jagatramka S/o Late Shri Banwari Lal Jagatramka Aged About 65 Years R/o Infront Of Gandhi Chowk, Raigarh Tahsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - Chhattisgarh State Through Additional Commissioner, Revenue Bilaspur Range, Bilaspur Camp Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 2 - Indarpal Singh Bhatia S/o Late Harvansh Singh Bhatia R/o Dhimarpur Road, Presently Residing At Red Queen Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 3 - Sunil Kumar Agrawal S/o Late Ramdas Agrawal R/o Friends Colony, Kotra Road, Bypass, Presently Residing At Chandni Chowk Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 4 - Ponam Chand Agrawal D/o Late Lalchand Agrawal Aged About 54 Years R/o Gandhi Ganj Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh 5 - Pradeep Kejdiwal S/o Late Manohar Lal Kejdiwal R/o Subhash Chowk Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Suresh Kumar Jagatramka, petitioner in person For State : Mr. Sanjeev Agrawal, Panel Lawyer For Respondents No.2 & 3 : Ms. Pragati Pandey, Advocate, holding the brief of Mr. Hari Agrawal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE -2- 22.07.2025 1) Mr. Jagatramka submitted that the matter pending before the learned Additional Commissioner, Bilaspur, has already been concluded; thus, this writ petition has become infructuous. 2) Not opposed by the other side. 3) Recording the submission made by Mr. Jagatramka, this writ petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nadim