S.V.RAMANA RAO, PRAKASHAM DIST v. PRL SECY, HOME DEPT, HYDERABAD & 3 OTHERS
WP/17224/2016 · 2025-09-15
Ninala Jayasurya, Tuhin Kumar Gedela
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33153 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33153 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010495042016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION No.17224 OF 2016 Between: S.V.Ramana Rao, S/o. S.Venkateshwar Rao, Aged 40 years, Occ: Police Employee, R/o: H.No.6-8-622, 9th Lane, Sujatha nagar, Ongole, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner
AND The Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary. Home Department, Secretariat, Lower Tank Bund, Hyderabad, and others. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr.V.B.Subrahmanyam Counsel for the Respondents: G.P. for Home
G.P. for Services I
The Court made the following ORDER: (per Hon’ble NJS,J)
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, who appeared through online. Though the learned counsel states that subsequent to filing of the writ petition, the revision petition filed by the writ petitioner was rejected by proceedings of the Director General, dated 15.12.2016, signed on 04.1.2017, and petition seeking amendment of cause title and payer is filed, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to challenge the proceedings dated 15.12.2016.
2 WP_17224_2016
2. Granting liberty as prayed for, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner may work out his remedies in accordance with law. No orders as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J
_____________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA,J September 16, 2025 vasu