Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3315 (UTT)

MANMOHAN SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/194/2016 · 2025-06-03

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Subhash Upadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSB 194/2016 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J. Ms. Ananya Jain, Advocate, i/b Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the petitioner, makes a statement at the bar that writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time and it may be dismissed as such. (2) In view of the statement made by learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as infrcutuous. (Subhash Upadhyay, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 03.06.2025 Pr