THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. RUBEENA YASMIN @ RUBINA YASMIN
I.A.(Civil)/1016/2025 · 2026-05-10
Mridul Kumar Kalita
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3315 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3315 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010068032025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1016/2025 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD A CO. REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL MANAGER, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI 7 VERSUS RUBEENA YASMIN @ RUBINA YASMIN W/O LATE ROMEZ UDDIN, R/O VILL. KOKILA, PART II, P.S. ABHAYAPURI, DIST. BONGAIGAON, ASSAM, PIN 791123 2:RAHUL AMIN S/O LATE ROMEZ UDDIN R/O VILL. KOKILA PART II P.S. ABHAYAPURI DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN 791123 3:RULIYA PARBIN D/O LATE ROMEZ UDDIN R/O VILL. KOKILA PART II P.S. ABHAYAPURI DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN 791123 4:POONMA RAM S/O GENA RAM
Page No.# 2/4 R/O VILL. CHHITARKATAR BARMER P.O. BARMER DIST. BRAMER RAJASTHAN PIN 344031 (OWNER OF THE TRUCK BEARING REGISTRATION NO RJ- 04/GB-8069) 5:ISHARA RAM S/O CHUNA RAM R/O VILL. CHATARA LEGON KI DHANI P.S. NAGAR DIST. BARMER RAJASTHAN PIN 344031. (DRIVER OF THE TRUCK BEARING REGISTRATION NO RJ- 04/GB-8069 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S K GOSWAMI, MR. R SHARMA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. M KHAN (R-1,2,3), MS J AKTAR(R-1,2,3),MR A K DAS(R- 1,2,3) In MAC App. Case No. 15680/2024 With MAC App. Case No. 15680/2024 (filing number)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
ORDER 11.05.2026 [1] Heard Mr. S.K. Goswami, the learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. M. Khan, the
learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1,2 and
Page No.# 3/4 3/claimants. [2] This interlocutory application has been filed by the applicant/insurance company praying for condonation of 20 days in filing the connected MACAppeal. [3] The learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3/claimants submits that he does not have any objection if the prayer for condonation of delay is allowed. [4] It also appears from the Office Note that the respondent No. 4 has expired and the notice issued to respondent No. 5 has not yet returned. [5] The learned counsel for the applicant submits that since the claimants does not have any objection against the prayer for condonation and since the connected appeal is basically against the quantum of the compensation granted to the claimants, hence, notice to other respondents may be waived. [6] The prayer is allowed. [7] I have gone through the grounds of delay stated in the instant interlocutory application. [8] Considering the grounds stated therein to be sufficient cause which prevented the applicant from preferring the appeal within the prescribed period of limitation, the delay of 20 days in preferring the connected appeal is hereby condoned and this
Page No.# 4/4 interlocutory application is allowed. [9] Let the connected MACAppeal be registered by the Registry and list the same for admission on 15th June, 2026. [10] The name of Mr. M. Khan may be reflected in the cause list henceforth as engaged counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant