Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3315 (AP)

K HARSHAD AHMED RAJ v. SHAIK GAFIRA IRHA

TRCRLP/6/2025 · 2025-08-13

Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010015962025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] THURSDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO TRANSFER CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6/2025 Between: K Harshad Ahmed Raj ...PETITIONER AND Shaik Gafira Irha and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A SYAM SUNDAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2. JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: 1. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for both sides is present and represented that the matter has been settled out of the Court between both parties and that the cause in the present transfer criminal petition does not survive for further adjudication and therefore, the transfer criminal petition has become infructuous and requested to close the same. 2. By recording the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for both sides, the Transfer Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date: 14.08.2025 SRT