IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MP(M) No. 2671 of 2025 Date of Decision : 9.12.2025 Rakesh alias Kando ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate. For the respondent/State : Mr. Jitender Sharma, Additional Advocate General, assisted by ASI Mohinder Singh, IO, PS Gaggal, District Kangra, HP. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) It has been submitted that the petitioner wants to approach learned Magistrate under Section 480(6) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) to redress his grievance. Hence, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Learned Magistrate shall not be in6uenced by any order passed by this Court in the present proceedings, while deciding the petition under Section 480(6) of BNSS, if so 8led. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 The pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 9th December, 2025 (Chander)