APHC010494182018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 683/2018 Between: 1. POTHANAPALLI VARALAXMI, W/O. SIMHADRI AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION. R/O. H.NO. 1-705, DHANALAPETA STREET, PALLI SARADHI VILLAGE, VAJRAPUKOTTURU MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT ...APPELLANT AND 1. TAMADA KRISHNA RAO, S/O. LATE LATCHAYYA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. H.NO. 2-8 EKA VEEDHI, GOLLASARDHI VILLAGE, SOMPETA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. TAMADA SAMBAMURTHY, S/O. KRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. H.NO. 2-8 EKA VEEDHI, GOLLASARDHI VILLAGE, SOMPETA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. TAMADA DILLESWARA RAO, S/O. KRISHNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION R/O. H.NO. 2-8 EKA VEEDHI, GOLLASARDHI VILLAGE, SOMPETA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 4. TAMADA VIJAYAKUMAR, S/O. KRISHNARAO, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION RIO. H.NO. 2-8 EKA VEEDHI, GOLLASARDHI VILLAGE, SOMPETA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against ordersagainst the order in LAND, 66 of 2018 in A.S.No.6 of 2018 dated 02-04-2018 on the file of the court of the VI Additional District Judge, Sompeta, for the following among others. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant an ad-interim injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with the peaceful possession of the petitioner suit schedule property in O.S.No.121 of 2004 in A.S.No.6 of 2018 on the file of the court of the junior Civil Judge, Palasa, pending disposal of the above C.M.A. and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Appellant: 1. A PADMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SAPTHAGIRI METTA 3 The Court made the following Judgment: Learned counsel for the appellant submits that due to subsequent developments, no further orders are necessary to be passed and accordingly, the appeal be closed. 2. Recording the said statement, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN Date: 29.07.2025 KBN