Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33135 (RAJ)

STATE OF RAJASTHAN v. SANDEEP MADAN SON OF SHRI R.K. MADAN

SAW/712/2024 · 2025-04-16

Anand Sharma, Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:16196-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 712/2024 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Art, Literature, Culture And Archaeology, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Jawahar Kala Kendra, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur- 302015 Through Its Director General. ----Appellants Versus 1. Sandeep Madan Son Of Shri R.k. Madan, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of 3-Ja-32, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur-302004 (Deceased) 1/1. Babita Madan W/o Late Shri Sandeep Madan, Aged About 49 Years, Resident Of 3-Ja-32, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur-302 004 1/2. Chinmaya Madan S/o Late Shri Sandeep Madan, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of 3-Ja-32, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur-302 004 1/3. Maan Madan (Minor) S/o Late Shri Sandeep Madan, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of 3-Ja-32, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur-302 004 ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Pradeep Mathur For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prateek Jain for Mr. Mahendra Singh HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 16/04/2025 1. This appeal is misconceived as State and Jawahar Kala Kendra both could not have been joined as co-appellant in one and the same appeal. It is stated by the appellants that State has neither appeared, nor contested the matter before the learned [2025:RJ-JP:16196-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-712/2024] Single Judge. It is also argued that the recommendation for registration was made by Jawahar Kala Kendra but the State is not accepting the same. 2. In that view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with liberty to file separate appeals, if so advised. (ANAND SHARMA),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ N.Gandhi/Neeru/49