[2025:RJ-JP:267] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14364/2024 Suganaram S/o Ganpatlal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Peeh, Police Station Peelwa, District Nagaur (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Ramganj Mandi). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 03/01/2025 1. The accused-applicant has filed this bail application under Section 483 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, arising out of F.I.R. No.37/2023, registered with the Police Station Modak, District Kota Rural for offence under Sections 8/20 of NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that now the police, after completion of investigation, has submitted charge sheet in the matter stating therein that the accused-applicant has falsely been implicated in this case merely on the basis of statement of co-accused namely; Bhuwnesh Kumar Agnihotri @ Sonu Sharma. Learned counsel further submits that no recovery of any contraband has been effected from the possession of accused- applicant and he is in the custody from the date of his arrest. Learned counsel also submits that co-accused Bhuwnesh Kumar Agnihotri and Shivraj Mahawar @ Shiva have already been enlarged on bail. Learned counsel further submits that case of the [2025:RJ-JP:267] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14364/2024] present accused-applicant is in no manner distinguishable from the case of co-accused Bhuwnesh Kumar Agnihotri & Shivraj Mahawar @ Shiva, who have already been enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. It is submitted that the accused-applicant is a part of the team, which is involved in the narcotics dealings. 4. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties at par and perused the challan papers. 5. Since no recovery of any contraband has been effected from the possession of the accused-applicant and similarly situated co- accused namely; Bhuwnesh Kumar Agnihotri @ Sonu Sharma & Shivraj Mahawar @ Shiva, have already been enlarged on bail, this Court, so as to maintain parity, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. 6. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-applicant shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /24