IN TH 113-I Balvir Sing Kashmir S Phagwara CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o Division Singh vs. disposed of Phagwara of non-feas accordance receiving a COCP-701-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.701 of Date of decision ir Singh Versus mir Singh Malli, Chairman, Phagw wara, District Kapurthala and othe AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Vaneet Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manbir Singh Batta, Advo for respondents No.1 to 5. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Mr. Karan Singh, SDO and Jag Irrigation/BDC Department, Ja for respondent No.6. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 15.5.2014 (An Bench of this Court in CWP- h vs. State of Punjab and others”, sed of with a direction to “…the Sta ara Improvement Trust to consider feasibility of the Scheme and take ance with law, within a period of th ing a certified copy of this order…” 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 701 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-24.02.2026 …..Petitioner Phagwara Improvement Trust, d others …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA , Advocate i, AAG Punjab assisted by and Jagtar Singh, Ziledar, ent, Jalandhar ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a -9318-2014 titled as “Balbir , whereby the petition was State of Punjab as well as the ider the above-mentioned issue ake an appropriate decision in of three months from the date of …” VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.27 18.00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Jarnail Nan Phagwara, already bee same is tak for the peti submits tha been comp (Annexure survives in disposed of made by l petition is challenge t as per law. February Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-701-2025 (O & M) Short reply dated 12.5.2025 il Nangal, presently posted as Chai wara, District Kapurthala on behalf of dy been filed in the Registry, which i is taken on record. Copy thereof is s e petitioner. At the very outset, learned co its that the Writ Court order dated 15. complied with while passing a Speak exure R-1/1) by the respondent-au ves in the present contempt petitio sed of. In view of the facts noted a by learned counsel for the petitio ion is disposed of. However, liberty is enge the said Speaking Order dated 2 r law. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, uary 24, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 2025 by way of affidavit of Shri Chairman, Improvement Trust, half of respondents No.1 to 5 has hich is annexed on the file. The eof is supplied to learned counsel ed counsel for the petitioner ted 15.5.2014 (Annexure P-1) has Speaking Order dated 20.8.2014 authority, therefore, nothing petition and the same may be oted above and the submissions petitioner, the present contempt erty is granted to the petitioner to ated 20.8.2014 (Annexure R-1/1) if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.27 18.00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document