Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33118 (KAR)

SMT. SUMA v. SRI. SHIVAJYOTHI COETERS (OWNER)

MFA/5043/2017 · 2025-06-11

C M Poonacha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20021 MFA No. 5043 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5043 OF 2017 (MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SUMA W/O LATE RAVIRAJ SHETTY AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS 2. KUM POOJA D/O LATE RAVIRAJ SHETTY AGED ABOUT 13 YEARS APPELLANT NO.2 IS MINOR REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER APPELLANT NO.1 BOTH ARE RESIDING AT 3RD CROSS, GOVINDAIAH BUILDING PEENYA 2ND STAGE BANGALORE 560058 NOW RESIDING AT LAKSHMIPURA EXTENSION SAKALKESHPURA TOWN SAKALESHPURA HASSAN DISTRICT 573137 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. B M HALASWAMY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. SHIVAJYOTHI COETERS (OWNER) NO. SM 7, 3RD CROSS, 3RD STAGE, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BANGALORE – 560058 (OWNER AND DRIVER OF THE VEHICLE) 2. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD NO L 143/144 CKN CHAMBERS Digitally signed by BHARATHI S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20021 MFA No. 5043 of 2017 1ST FLOOR, 1 A MAIN ROAD, SESHADRIPURAM BANGALORE - 20 REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGER THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD HASSAN BRANCH …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 22.11.2016 PASSED IN MVC NO.1729/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, & JMFC, MACT, SAKLESHPUR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL JUDGMENT None appears for the appellants in the morning session or in the afternoon session. 2. The above appeal was filed on 24.06.2017 and the appeal was listed after compliance of office objections on 27.02.2018. This Court ordered issuance of notice on I.A.1/2017. Since requisite process fee has not been paid, the appeal once again re-listed before this Court on 15.06.2023, wherein notice was ordered if the requisite process fee has been paid. Till this date, the process fee has not been paid. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20021 MFA No. 5043 of 2017 There is no appearance on behalf of the appellants today and needful has also not been done. 3. In view of the aforementioned, it appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the above appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE BS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28