APHC010492832025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) i o > :3 1. o\S o THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25288 OF 2025 Between: 1. G Eeshwar Rao, S/o. Late Demudu R/o Cheedipalem, Mushidipalli Panchayat, Srivangavarapukota Mandal, Vizainagaram District. 2. 2. Podugu Revathi, D/o Rambabu, aged 36 years, R/o Ammapalem Village, Tennuboddavara Panchayat, Vizianagaram District. 3. Mutyala Sanyasamma, W/o aged 64 Sringavarapukota Mandal, Vizianagaram District. 4. Ichapurapu Gopal Rao, S/o Demudu, aged 56 years, R/o Ammapalem Village, Tennuboddavara Panchayat, Vizianagaram District. Sringavarapukota Mandal R/o Mushidipalli years Sringavarapukota Mandal ...Petitioners AND 1. The Inspector Of Police, Sringavarapukota Mandal District 2. The Superintendent of Police, Vizianagaram District. 3. The state of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary (Home Department) Velagapudi, Amaravati. Vizianagaram ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly ^7? in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the actions one of the . respondents in issuing the letter dated Mill in response to our representation dated 16.08.2025 which received by on 22.08.2025, out rightly refusing to give permission to us to express our protest and making demonstrations against the policies and orders of the state such as doing hunger strikes in temporary tents peacefully and to lead a peaceful and silent procession with placards showing the dissent against the actions of us the government pertaining to deprival of our lands in favour of a company which is intending to do real estate business with the lands snatched away from our hands ruthlessly as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and in flagrant violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed by constitution and to consequently direct the respondents to permit us on such dated and times as this court deems fit to show our protest and dissent by way of silent and unarmed processions on the streets without disturbing the flow of traffic and to do relay hunger strikes m temporary tents and to do such all other ways of peaceful protest and demonstrations etc., against the policy and orders of the unjustly depriving us from our lands for state government in a company which is proposing to do real estate business instead of establishing the proposed aluminum complex without fulfilling the RR package. refinery lA NO: 1 OF 2n7R Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an interim order permitting us on such dates and times as this court deems fit to show our protest and dissent by way of silent and unarmed processions on the streets without disturbing the flow of traffic and to do relay hunger strikes in temporary tents and to do such all other ways of peaceful protest and demonstrations etc., against the policy and orders of the state government in unjustly depriving us from our lands for a company which is proposing to do real estate establishing the proposed aluminum refinery complex without fulfilling package. business instead of the RR Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI K SARVA BHOUMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No’s. 1 to 3: SRI V FAROOQ AGP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: X 'T APHC010492832025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25288/2025 Between: 1.G EESHWAR RAO. S/0. LATE DEMUDU MUSHIDIPALLI PANCHAYAT, SRIVANGAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, VIZAINAGARAM DISTRICT. 2. R/0 CHEEDIPALEM, 2.PODUGU REVATHI, D/0 RAMBABU, AGED 36 YEARS, R/0 AMMAPALEM VILLAGE. TENNUBODDAVARA PANCHAYAT, SRINGAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 3. 3.MUTYALA SANYASAMMA, W/0 AGED 64 YEARS, MUSHIDIPALLI, SRINGAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 4. R/0 4.ICHAPURAPU GOPAL RAO, S/0 DEMUDU, AGED 56 YEARS. R/0 AMMAPALEM VILLAGE, TENNUBODDAVARA PANCHAYAT, SRINGAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SRINGAVARAPUKOTA MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 3. 3.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME DEPARTMENT) VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 I Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the actions of the respondents in issuing the letter dated Mill in response to our representation dated 16.08.2025 which received by us on 22.08.2025, outrightly refusing to give permission to us to express our protest and making demonstrations against the policies and orders of the state such as doing hunger strikes in temporary tents peacefully and to lead a peaceful and silent procession with placards showing the dissent against the actions of the government pertaining to deprival of our lands in favour of a company which is intending to do real estate business with the lands snatched away from our hands ruthlessly as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and in flagrant violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed by constitution and to consequently direct the respondents to permit us on such dated and times as this court deems fit to show our protest and dissent by way of silent and unarmed processions on the streets without disturbing the flow of traffic and to do relay hunger strikes in temporary tents and to do such all other ways of peaceful protest and demonstrations etc., against the policy and orders of the state government in unjustly depriving us from our lands for a company which is proposing to do real estate business instead of establishing the proposed aluminum refinery complex without fulfilling the RR package and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K SARVA BHOUMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME 3 n THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25288 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “...pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the actions of the respondents in issuing the letter dated Mill in response to our representation dated 16.08.2025 which received by us on 22.08.2025, outrightly refusing to give permission to us to express our protest and making demonstrations against the policies and orders of the state such as doing hunger strikes in temporary tents peacefully and to lead a peaceful and silent procession with placards showing the dissent against the actions of the government pertaining to deprival of our lands in favour of a company which is intending to do real estate business with the lands snatched away from our hands ruthlessly as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and in flagrant violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed by constitution and to consequently direct the respondents to permit us on such dated and times as this court deems fit to show our protest and dissent by way of silent and unarmed processions on the streets without disturbing the flow of traffic and to do relay hunger strikes in temporary tents and to do such all other ways of peaceful protest and demonstrations etc., against the policy and orders of the state government in unjustly depriving us from our lands for a company which is proposing to do real estate business instead of establishing the proposed aluminum refinery complex without fulfilling the RR package and to pass....” Heard Sri K.Sarva Bhouma Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the 2. respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the grievance of the petitioners is that the respondent authorities issued a letter dated -nil-, in to their representation dated 16.08.2025 which was received by the petitioners on 22.08.2025 refusing to give permission to the petitioners to express their protest and making demonstrations against the policies such as doing hunger strikes in temporary tents peacefully and peaceful procession with placards. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that on 29.08.2025, regarding the same issue, the petitioners again approached the Dy. Superintendent of Police, Vizianagaram for permission. Upon that, the Dy. Superintendent of Police issued permission to the petitioners on 02.09.2025 by giving permission to them to conduct protests at Raithu Bharosa Kendram at Moola Boddavara Village of S.Kota Mandal, but the petitioners did not conduct any protest or procession in the said area. He would further submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions, since the permission to conduct the protest was already granted on the earlier occasion and the petitioners could not conduct the same, it is apposite to dispose of the present petition permitting the petitioners to organize peaceful protest along with 30-40 farmers at open place beside Raithu Bharosa Kendram, Ammapalem Village of S.Kota Mandal on 24.09.2025 from 10.00 am to 04.00 pm without disrupting public peace and tranquility. The respondent authorities are directed to take necessary precautions to see that the said protest will be conducted in a 3. response 4. 5 <» peaceful manner. In case of occurrence of any untoward incident, the respondent authorities are directed to take necessary steps in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- B CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Inspector of Police, Sringavarapukota Mandal, Vizianagaram District 2. The Superintendent of Police, Vizianagaram District. 3. 3. The state of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary (Home Department) Velagapudi, Amaravati. 4. One CC to SRI. K SARVA BHOUMA RAO, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 6. Three CD Copies PRK (gsg) 4 HIGH COURT DATED:18/09/2025 ORDER WP NO. 25288 OF 2025 Sf 2 0 SEP 2025 ^ Sectiojt^^y _co» DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS