SONU @ SATYENDRA SINGH S/O SHRI SHIVRAJ SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
SOSA/2143/2024 · 2025-09-04
Bhuwan Goyal, Inderjeet Singh
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33113 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 33113 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:35470-DB] (1 of 2) [SOSA-2143/2024] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application No. 2143/2024 in D. B. Criminal Appeal No.280/2023 Sonu @ Satyendra Singh S/o Shri Shivraj Singh, R/o Gulkhedi, P.s. Panwad, District Jhalawar (Presently Lodged In Central Jail, Kota) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor
2. Balram S/o Shri Rampratap, R/o Gulkhedi Ps Panwad Dsitrict Jhalawar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Jain, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, Additional Government Advocate.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 04/09/2025
1. Heard on application for suspension of sentence.
2. Counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the accused- applicant has been falsely implicated in this matter. Counsel further submits that the accused-applicant has already served the sentence for a period of six years. Therefore, it is prayed that sentence imposed upon the accused-applicant be suspended during the pendency of the appeal.
[2025:RJ-JP:35470-DB] (2 of 2) [SOSA-2143/2024]
3. Learned Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General assisted by learned Additional Government Advocate opposed the application seeking suspension of sentence.
4. We have heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.
5. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and also considering the testimonies of ocular witnesses namely PW5 and PW8 and also considering the fact that allegation of causing firearm injury on the person of the deceased is leveled against the applicant-accused and weapon of offence i.e. gun has also been recovered at the instance of the applicant-accused, no case is made out for suspending the sentence imposed upon the accused-applicant.
6. Hence, this application for suspension of sentence is dismissed.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Tushar/19