APHC010493862025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 25857 OF 2025 Between: 1. B BHASKAR REDDY, S/o. Late B. Ranga Reddy, aged about 62 years, R/o. T.C. Agraharam village, Vadamalapeta Post and Mandal, Tirupati District ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Energy Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. Southern Power Distribution Company of A P Ltd, Represented by its Chairman and Managing Director, 19-13-65/A Srinivasapuram, Tiruchanoor Road, Tirupati. 3. The Superintendent Engineer, Operation Circle APSPDCL, Tirupati, Tirupati District. 4. The Executive Engineer, Operations Circle,APSPDCL Puttur, Tirupati District 5. The Deputy Executive Engineer, Operations Circle,APSPDCL, Puttur, Tirupati District ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: S VARADARAJULU CHETTY Counsel for the Respondents: VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR ENERGY 2 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri S. Varadarajulu Chetty, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri K. Ashok, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Venkata Rama Rao Kota, learned Standing Counsel for APSPDCL. 2. Sri K. Ashok, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Venkata Rama Rao Kota, learned Standing Counsel for APSPDCL has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Assistant Engineer, Operation, APSPDCL, Tirupati District along with the copy of the letter of the Writ Petitioner as well as Objection Certificate of Village Revenue Officer dated 17.07.2025 & 02.08.2025 respectively. Copies of the same are also furnished to the learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner. The same are taken on record. 3. The letter of the Writ Petitioner dated 17.07.2025 would indicate that the Writ Petitioner agreed for erecting electricity poles through a different land and that the Writ Petitioner has also undertaken to pay the differential revised estimates. The said letter would also indicate that the Writ Petitioner has undertaken to ensure that there will not be any objection from any corner while erecting the electricity poles. 4. Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, having gone through the letter of the Writ Petitioner dated 17.07.2025, have no objection for disposal of the present Writ Petition in view of the terms and conditions in the undertaking given by the Writ Petitioner in his letter dated 17.07.2025. 5. In this view of the matter, the present Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Writ Petitioner to adhere to the undertaking given by him in his letter dated 17.07.2025. No Order as to Costs. 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 25.09.2025 JKS 3 63 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No. 25857 OF 2025 25.09.2025 JKS