Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33102 (KAR)

MRS. AYESHA SUHANA v. MR. SHABBER AHMED

CRL.P/10640/2024 · 2025-03-12

H P Sandesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:10649 CRL.P No. 10640 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.10640 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. MRS. AYESHA SUHANA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, D/O MUKKACHERY ABDUL HAMED 2. AMANAH ZULEKHA AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS, D/O AYESHA SUHANA 3. ARMAAN ABDUL REHMAN AGED ABOUT 7 YEARS, S/O AYESHA SUHANA No.2 AND 3 ARE REP. BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER - MRS AYESHA ALL ARE R/AT No.31, 3RD CROSS, NEAR PSTI QUARTERS TEACHER C/O MOHAMMED RAFEEQ AHEMAD COLONY SUBRAMANYAPURA MAIN ROAD VTC BANASHANKARI II STAGE, SUB DISTRICT BANGALORE SOUTH – 560070 …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. AKSHATHA SHETTY K, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:10649 CRL.P No. 10640 of 2024 AND: MR. SHABBER AHMED AGED 48 YEARS S/O M A REHMAN R/AT FATHIMA APARTMENT FLAT No.602, BRITTO LANE FALNIR, MANGALORE – 575001 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI SACHIN B S.,ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 407 OF CR.PC. PRAYING TO TRANSFER THE CRL.P IN CRL.MISC.NO.47/2024 ON THE FILE OF PRL. FAMILY COURT AT MANGALORE TO THE FAMILY COURT AT BENGALURU AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. 2. The ground for transfer of petition invoking Section 407 of Cr.P.C is that earlier petitioner No.1 along with petitioner Nos.2 and 3 were staying in Mangaluru and subsequently, they shifted to the Bengaluru. The counsel - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:10649 CRL.P No. 10640 of 2024 for the respondent also not disputes the fact that the respondent is staying abroad and only objection raised that the very petition itself is not maintainable. The question of maintainability of the petition has to be decided by the Trial Court. Thus, the said objection is kept open for consideration of the matter. 3. Having considered the fact that petitioner No.1 along with her children i.e., petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are staying at Bengaluru and the children are also pursuing their education in Bengaluru, it is appropriate to transfer Crl.Misc.No.47/2024 to the Family Court at Bengaluru from the Principal Family Court at Mangalore. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SN