Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33101 (AP)

Smt. Janga Venkata Lakshmi, v. Smt. Bayya Lakshmi @ Magapu Lakshmi

CRP/3068/2023 · 2025-07-31

T C D Sekhar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010492662023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3068/2023 Between: 1. SMT. JANGA VENKATA LAKSHMI,, W/O. LATE. J. KAMALAKAR, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 10-135/1, GROUND FLOOR, LAKSHMIPURAM, PAPAYYARAJUPALEM, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. SRI. J. MADHU KISHORE,, S/O. LATE. J. KAMALAKAR, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 10-135/1, GROUND FLOOR, LAKSHMIPURAM, PAPAYYARAJUPALEM, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. SRI. J. VENKATESH,, S/O. LATE. J. KAMALAKAR, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 10-135/1, GROUND FLOOR, LAKSHMIPURAM, PAPAYYARAJUPALEM, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SMT BAYYA LAKSHMI MAGAPU LAKSHMI, W/O. BAYYA PRASAD, D/O. MAGAPU RANGA RAO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 39-11-68/2, MURLAI NAGAR, 2 VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. SRI BAYYA TARUN, S/O. BAYYA PRASAD, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 39-11-68/2, MURLAI NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to set aside the order dated 17-08-2023 passed in I.A. No. 101/2022 in O.S. No.92/2022 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Beemunipatnam by allowing the CRP in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KRISHNA DARAPU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. B.MADHU 3 The Court made the following order: It is represented by the counsel for the petitioners that, the cause in the instant Civil Revision Petition does not survive. 2. The said submission is placed on record. In view of the same, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the instant revision and accordingly the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR Dt.01.08.2025 DSB 4 206 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR CRP No.3068 of 2023 Date 01.08.2025 U DSB