220 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT DHFL Insurance Company Limited vs Bebi Devi and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: None for the appellant Mr. Arvind Rajotia, Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 4 VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral) 1. There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. 2. Learned counsel for the claimants/respondents submits that the appellant-insurance company has not hearings. 3. Perusal of the record would show that none had appeared behalf of the the position today. 4. In view of the aforesaid, this Court is constrained to infer that the respondent - insurance company is not interested 5. Dismissed for want of prosecution. July 25, 2025 mohan bimbra Whether speaking/reasons: Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- FAO-1720-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 25.07.2025 DHFL Insurance Company Limited vs Bebi Devi and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI None for the appellant Mr. Arvind Rajotia, Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 4 -.- VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral) There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Learned counsel for the claimants/respondents submits that the insurance company has not been Perusal of the record would show that none had appeared appellant on 29.03.2023, 28.11.2023 the position today. In view of the aforesaid, this Court is constrained to infer that the insurance company is not interested Dismissed for want of prosecution. Whether speaking/reasons: Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 25.07.2025 ……Petitioner …Respondent HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Mr. Arvind Rajotia, Advocate for respondents No. 1 to 4 There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Learned counsel for the claimants/respondents submits that the been appearing for the last three Perusal of the record would show that none had appeared on appellant on 29.03.2023, 28.11.2023 and 02.02.2024. Same is In view of the aforesaid, this Court is constrained to infer that the insurance company is not interested in pursuing the appeal. Dismissed for want of prosecution. (VIKAS SURI) JUDGE Learned counsel for the claimants/respondents submits that the for the last three on and 02.02.2024. Same is In view of the aforesaid, this Court is constrained to infer that the MOHAN LAL BIMBRA 2025.07.30 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document