2025:JHHC:33076 --1-- A.B.A. No. 6254 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 6254 of 2025 ---- Gaurav Jha @ Gaurav Kumar Jha, aged about 28 years, son of Deepak Kumar Jha, R/o Habitat Residence Phase 2, Tower D8- 404, Sector 781, Kheri Kalan, PO – Kheri Kalan, PS – BPTP, District – Faridabad, Haryana .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Prakash Jha, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Sudhir Kr. Mahto, Advocate For the Informant :- Mr. Ashim Kr. Sahani, Advocate ---- 04/04.11.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ranchi (Mahila) P.S. Case No.02 of 2025 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 85, 115(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner happened to be the husband of the informant. He further submits that the petitioner has filed a case under Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for restitution of conjugal rights on 24.12.2024 at Faridabad and thereafter the present FIR has been lodged after receiving notice in the said case by the informant. He 2025:JHHC:33076 --2-- A.B.A. No. 6254 of 2025 then submits that any gift which was given to the parents of the petitioner that is prior of the marriage and after marriage nothing has been received by the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State and Informant jointly opposes the prayer and submits that the petitioner is the husband and the allegations are there of assault and in view of that the anticipatory bail of the petitioner may kindly be rejected. 5. Considering that under Section 9 the petition was filed earlier and it has been pointed out that after receiving of the summon the present FIR has been lodged against the petitioner and the petitioner happened to be the husband of the petitioner and in that view of the matter the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 04.11.2025 Sangam/