Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33094 (RAJ)

SMT. DR. MEENAKSHI SAXENA (SINCE DECEASED) W/O SHRI VINAY SAXENA v. SMT. RAKHI SINGH CHAUHAN W/O SHRI VIRENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN

CW/17705/2024 · 2025-01-02

Avneesh Jhingan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:51] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17705/2024 1. Smt. Dr. Meenakshi Saxena (Since Deceased) W/o Shri Vinay Saxena, R/o House No. B-75, Raman Marg, Tilak Nagr, Jaipur. 1/1. Dr. Vinay Saxena S/o Shri Suresh Prasad Saxena, Aged About 66 Years, R/o House No. B-75, Raman Marg, Tilak Nagr, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus Smt. Rakhi Singh Chauhan W/o Shri Virendra Singh Chauhan, R/o Plot No. 29-E/281, Yojna Pratap Nagar, Sanganer, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Siddharth Bapna with Mr. Meyhul Mittal For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Order 02/01/2025 1. This petition was filed seeking direction to the Rent Tribunal No.2, Jaipur Metropolitan-I to decide Eviction Suit No.184/2020 titled as Dr. Meenakshi Saxena Vs. Smt. Rakhi Singh Chauhan in a time bound manner. 2. There is no data made available to the Court with regard to number of cases pending and the details of daily docket of the Rent Tribunal. 3. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make a request before the Court concerned for expeditious disposal. [2025:RJ-JP:51] (2 of 2) [CW-17705/2024] 4. There is no doubt in the eventuality of petitioner approaching the Court concerned for deciding the suit, the same shall be considered in accordance with law, taking into consideration that the petitioner is a senior citizen and also the provisions of Section 15 (5) of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001. 5. In any case, no unwarranted adjournment shall be granted to either of the parties. (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Simple Kumawat /27