- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:56 RFA No. 543 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 543 OF 2020 (DEC) BETWEEN: SMT. MAMATHA.G.C. W/O. R.VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT NO.37/1, 'A'-TYPE, K.P.W.D.QUARTERS, JEEVANABHIMNAGAR, NEW THIPPASANDRA POST, BANGALORE-560 075. …APPELLANT (BY SMT. SHWETHA., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. L.S.CHIKKANNAGOUDAR., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY STATE OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. 3. THE DIRECTOR-DEAN, BMCRL, FORT, K.R.ROAD, BANGALORE-560 002. 4. THE DIRECTOR, KARNATAKA SECONDARY Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:56 RFA No. 543 of 2020 EDUCATION EXAMINATION BOARD, MALLESHWARAM CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 003. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 1 & 2 R/W SECTION 96 OF CPC. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Smt.Shwetha., counsel on behalf of Sri.Chikkanagoudar.L.S., for the appellant has appeared in person. Counsel for the appellant seeks time to comply with the office objections. This Court is not inclined to grant time. The reason is plain. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed before the Court on several dates and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Despite granting time, office objections are not complied with as of today. The appeal is listed today for orders regarding non- compliance of office objections for the sixth time. A perusal of the entire order sheet reveals that despite giving sufficient - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:56 RFA No. 543 of 2020 opportunities, the office objections are not complied with. Furthermore, the appeal is filed in the year 2020. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The appeal is pending for almost five years. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 49