APHC010494152024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2707/2024 Between: 1. MOGHAL NAJEEMA BEGUM, W/O MOGHAL AJEEJ BAIG, AGED 53 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, R/O D.NO.4-118, ANJANEYA STREET, DONAKONDA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. POTHINI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O ANJANEYULU, AGED 43 YEARS. CULTIVATION, R/O POTHINAVARIPALEM VILLAGE, KARAMCHEDU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. SYYED SHAMIN BHANU, W/O LATE SHAMSHUDDIN, AGED 50 YEARS. HOUSEWIFE, R/O D.NO.37-2-L-15- 19/A, OPP TO FLOOR MILL, RICKSHOW BAZAAR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DIST. 3. IMTIYAZ, S/O LATE SHAMSHUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS. BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. D.NO.37-2-L-15-19/A, OPP TO FLOUR MILL RICKSHOW BAZAAR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DIST. 2 4. SYYED IRSHAN, S/O LATE SHAMSHUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS. BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. D.NO.37-2-L- 15-19/A, OPP TO FLOOR MILL, RICKSHOW BAZAAR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DIST. 5. SHAIK MAHABOOB BASHA, S/O SHAIK JAFER SAHEB, BUSINESS, R/O DAGGUBADU VILLAGE, KARAMCHEDU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to set aside the office objections raised in the EA CFR No. 1533/2024 in E.P.No.28 of 2019 in O.S.No.l99 of 2014 on the file of Senior Civil Judge Parchur dt28-10-2024 as unsustainable under law, by considering the compliance of the objections and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in E.P.No.28 of 2019 in O.S.No.l99 of 2014 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Parchur pending disposal of the main CRP and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N A RAMACHANDRA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. MARRI VENKATA RAMANA The Court made the following: 3 CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2707 of 2024 ORDER:- The petitioner filed application under Order XXI Rule 58 CPC, claiming right over the petition schedule property in EP No.28 of 2019 in OS No.199 of 2014, on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Parchur. The said application was returned on 28.10.2024 with certain objections. The petitioner claims that she has complied with the objections and re-submitted the same on 01.11.2024. 2. The executing court again returned the said application on 01.11.2024, on the ground that objection No.2 was not properly complied with. Aggrieved by the same, the present revision petition is filed. 3. On perusal of the record, it is clear that the executing court returned the application filed by the petitioner in EA CFR No.1571 of 2024. The petitioner instead of complying with the said objections, approached this Court by filing the present revision petition. 4. Having regard to the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present 4 revision petition and accordingly the same is dismissed. However, this order will not preclude the petitioner to comply with the objections raised by the executing court in accordance with law. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR 18.07.2025 DR 5 261 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR CRP No.2707 of 2024 Date 18.07.2025 DR