Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33090 (CHH)

AVADHRAM SIDAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2870/2019 · 2025-02-04

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:6349 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2870 of 2019 • Avadhram Sidar S/o Shri Milan Prasad Sidar Aged About 32 Years Caste - Gond, Bahirgami Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Kotmi, Block And Tahsil Dabhra, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat Ministry, Mahanadi Bhavan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. The Additional Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3. The Collector, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh 4. Sub Divisional Officer ( Revenue ) Dabhra, District, Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh 5. Shri Kamal Kishore Khute, S/o Shri Teklal Khute Aged About 35 Years Caste Satnami, R/o Gram Panchayat Kotmi, Block And Tahsil Dabhra, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh 6. Shri Girdhari Patel S/o Shri Harishankar Patel Aged About 25 Years Caste Aghariya, Up Sarpanch, R/o Gram Panchayat Kotmi, Block And Tahsil Dabhra, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Sachidanand Yadav, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 to 4/ State : Mr. Lav Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 04/02/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 This Hon’ble court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 30/07/2019 & order Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 dated 05/07/2019 passed by the Court of Additional Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, C.G. 10.2 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for entire records from the office of the respondents in respect of petitioner’s claim for kind perusal of this Hon’ble High Court. 10.3 That, any other Writ, order, directions or relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner” 2. At the very outset, Mr. Sachidanand Yadav, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the present petition has become infructuous, therefore, this petition may be dismissed being rendered infructuous. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Recording the statement made by Mr. Sachidanand Yadav, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti