Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3309 (JHR)

BHOLA PRASAD MAHTO v. UNION OF INDIA

WPC/253/2024 · 2025-03-28

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P(C). No. 253 of 2024 ---- Bhola Prasad Mahto, aged about 43 years, S/o Sewa Mahto, R/o Village- dhudhpaniya, near to Kanchan Gali, P.O. & P.S.-Dumri, Dist. Giridih. .......Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India 2. Union of India through the Secretary Ministry of Education, department of School Education and Literacy, Govt. of India, having its office at- Sgastri bhawan, New Delhi, P.O. & P.S. New Delhi, Sansad Marg, District- New Delhi. 3. Chairman of the Executive Committee through Hon’ble Minister of Education, Govt. of Jharkhand Ranchi, having its office at M.D.I. Building, Dhurwa, P.O. &P.S. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi. 4. Deputy Superintendent of Education, Bokaro, having its office at- Ramnagar Colony, Chas, Bokaro Steel City, P.O. Garga Check Post, P.S- Ramnagar, District- Bokaro. 5. Principal, Jawahar Navodaya Vidyaylay Tenughat, Bokaro, having its office at –Tenughat, Gharwatanr, P.O. & P.S.- Tenughat, District- Bokaro. 6. Principal, Saraswati Sishu Vidya Mandir Telo, having its office at –Telo, Chandrapura, P.O. &P.S.- Telo, District- Bokaro. .....Respondents --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Prakash Chandra Roy, Advocate Mr. Shiv Shankar Jee, Advocate For the State : Ms. Sunita Kumari, AC to Sr. SC-II For the U.O.I. : Mr. Anil Kumar, ASGI Mr. Shiv Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent No.6 : Mr. Abhay Kr. Mishra, Advocate Mr. Anshuman Mishra, Advocate --- 09/ Dated: 28.03.2025 1. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application. 2. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as withdrawn. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Vedanti/-