Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 33088 (AP)

Singaram Mani v. Syed Khadar Beebi

AS/3860/2003 · 2025-04-08

Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010493362003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO FIRST APPEAL NO: 3860/2003 Between: Singaram Mani ...APPELLANT AND Syed Khadar Beebi and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant: 1. V JAGAPATHI 2. CHALLA SIVASANKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M N NARASIMHA REDDY 2. K SURENDER RAJ The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, under the caption “For Dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondents is present. It seems that the appellant is not inclined to prosecute the appeal. 2. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date: 08.04.2025 SRT